MY
CLAIM TO THE UK CROWN & THRONE [for the reason] :
Indictment
of HRM Queen Elizabeth II for Treason
ROYAL DUTIES AS A CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH, CORONATION
OATH, HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II, JUNE 2, 1953
REASON :: NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
CONTENTS
- June 2, 1953, Coronation Vows: "REIGN" VS. "RULE"
- Defaults in ROYAL COVENANT OBLIGATIONS as if nonexistent.
- Adding Efforts to Confuse the Public, a political strategy for world dominance
- Looking Away, "NOT-SEE"ing EU-HEGEMONY as Predation on Peoples.
--Pedophilia, Human-trafficking
& Serial Wars, ALL in fact "just bidness," no one accountable for
harm.
--Debt & Class Bankruptcies, Bank Usury and investment fraud are running rampant, uncorrected.
--Wars for profits & prophets occur for PC-population reduction en masse, genocide & omnicide at work. .
--Radiological Contamination. The Crown is a primary purveyor, processor & marketing agency for reactive and depleted uranium used in fission reactors and armaments in the world.
--Debt & Class Bankruptcies, Bank Usury and investment fraud are running rampant, uncorrected.
--Wars for profits & prophets occur for PC-population reduction en masse, genocide & omnicide at work. .
--Radiological Contamination. The Crown is a primary purveyor, processor & marketing agency for reactive and depleted uranium used in fission reactors and armaments in the world.
- LAWS of Marriage and Bloodline.
- Tavistock Institute's Goal to OVERRULE Morality & Civil Ethics.
- UNESCO's Common Core Sex Ed Curricula
- Parties of the First Part, in the Royal Succession.
- 9. Looking to a Future to Live In.
June
2, 1953, Queen's Coronation Vows: "REIGN" VS. "RULE"
Transcript of the original
Coronation video, herein is the dialogue between the Queen and officials of the
Church of England at Her Majesty's Coronation.
.
. . dedicating herself before God, to the service of her subjects."
"Madam, is Your Majesty willing
to take the Oath?"
[HRM states] : "I am
willing."
"Will you solemnly promise and
swear to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and northern
Ireland--Canada, Australia, New Zealand, . . . according to their respective
laws and customs?"
[HRM states] : "I
solemnly promise so to do."
"Will you to your power, cause
Law and Justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgments?"
[HRM states] : "I
will."
"Will you, to the utmost of
your power, maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the
gospel? "Will you to the utmost of your power, maintain in the
United Kingdom, the Protestant Reformed religion established by law? “Will you
maintain and preserve invoilable, the settlement of the Church of England--and
the doctrine, worship, discipline and government thereof, as by Law established
in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and
of the churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges
as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?"
[HRM states] : "All this
I promise to do."
. . . [HRM states] : "The
things which I have herebefore promised, I will perform and keep, so help me
God."
IS
THIS CLEAR ENOUGH?
In a Constitutional Monarchy, it is
Members of Parliament who Rule by Law (legislation of Law and Statute Codes)
while the Sovereign reigns. The Monarch serves a function similar to
checks-and-balances in the United States Constitution. So Parliament is
charged with crafting statutes, once the foundational Laws for the country are
in place. It is fitting under such a Constitutional Monarchy for the King or
Queen to operate by powers listed below.
Executive
Power of the Queen or King of Britain:
- The power to choose and dismiss a prime minister.
- The power to dismiss ministers and the government, dissolve parliament and call for new elections.
- The power to enact laws and/or veto legislation passed by Parliament.
- The power to issue proclamations with Parliament's consent.
- The power to "exercise Crown prerogatives," including declaration of war and emergency.
- The right to read confidential government documents and intell reports, to advise and to warn.
- The power to elevate or exile individuals; pardon convicted felons, grant and bestow titles and honors, where she herself is immune from accusations of conflict of interest. This is a debatable issue due to the fact the Royal Family retenue reflect back on the Monarch's character; and there have been many unscrupulous, perfidious, deceitful Monarchs in our history to date.
ROYAL DUTIES AS A HOSPITALITY-P.R. EXECUTIVE:
As articulated in Annual
Financial Reports of Buckingham Palace, there is no correspondence or
similarity between "Her Majesty's Powers" and the actual carrying out
of functions she routinely performs. The Queen serves as corporatist mascot
of State and only includes ceremonial aspects of leadership--no
judgments or problem-solving or decision-making is included, as recorded in the
following activities in the 2011 Annual Report:
- Undertaking constitutional duties, for example the State Opening of Parliament, regular audiences with the Prime Minister, meetings of the Privy Council, giving Royal Assent to legislation and approving many appointments;
- Fulfilling constitutional responsibilities in relation to the Scottish Parliament and, where appropriate, the Welsh and Northern Ireland Assemblies;
- Carrying out State and Royal Visits overseas and receiving State and Official visitors to the United Kingdom;
- Receiving credentials from foreign Heads of Mission; and presenting honours at Investitures. In addition, the role of The Queen, supported by members of the Royal Family, extends more widely than these formal duties and includes:
- Providing a focus for national identity, unity and pride (for example on Remembrance Sunday and at times of national celebration or tragedy);
- Providing a sense of stability and continuity (for example by participating in traditional ceremonies such as Trooping the Colour);
- Recognising success, achievement and excellence (for example through visits, receptions and awards); and
- Contributing through public service and the voluntary sector to the life of the nation;
- In this area The Queen is particularly supported by the work of other members of the Royal Family (e.g. The Prince's Trust and The Duke of Edinburgh's Award Scheme).
CITATION: 2011 Annual
Financial Report of Buckingham Palace, page Conflicting Obligations
Renders the Monarch a puppet by choice
II
DEFAULT IN
ROYAL “COVENANT” OBLIGATIONS as if nonexistent.
Today the Monarch serves as a
consumer and not as "Mediator" in conflicts of interest and disputes
between Common and Statute Laws. She presides in name only, distancing herself
from making checks-and-balances that moral leadership demands, that the word
"REIGN" implies. She doesn't even speak up about or speak TO
conditions of slavery, war and want. But she's the head of the Church, so that
its Bishops don't speak up either; Bishops of the Church of England are also
silenced, especially with Tavistock across the street from the Archbishop of
Canterbury's office.
Whereas she vowed to protect and
support the Church of England, She sits quietly and allows Tavistock, which her
Grandfather King George V (along with Kaiser Wilhelm) helped establish, to
degrade, discount, demean and dishonor Britain's COVENANT epitomized by the
Stone of Scone under St. Edward the Confessor's Chair; but also British culture
and Law, in direct violation of her Coronation Vows.
Queen Elizabeth signed SIX
Lisbon Treaties that gave away her sovereign prerogatives--practically behind
closed doors and without the consent of the British peoples--to EU management
by distant, impersonal entities, unelected and unrepresentative of Britain.
She has reduced herself to the status of CEO of the United Kingdom Corporation.
Technically, there is nothing
“Royal” about Royals who join the EU, because the EU rules, but no Monarch has
the authority to combat conflicts of interest caused by EU legislation.
And so, the Royal Monarchs all sit together as peers who all still pretend to
be sovereigns having dominion even over themselves, while they are all yet
subject to EU top-down legislation.
Britain's Queen serves as hostess
and greeter, or she may send in a look-alike [doppelganger] lady-in-waiting.
Effectively, she is in the Hospitality Business, she entertains for the State
and she reads “My Government's Goals” without challenge or question.
CITY OF LONDON; INNS OF COURT; THE BAR.--She stands silent
and servile before the Inns of Court that run dual and twisted legalist systems
combining common law and Maritime statutes without regard to effects on working
classes.
Her Majesty's relationship to the Vatican, despite cautions
embedded in the 1689 Bill of Rights that imbue a “separate but equal” status
upon Her Majesty and the Pope, ignores the reality of infiltrating
practices of Jesuit and Occult chivalric Orders into UK society; namely, Order
of the Garter, of the Thistle, of the Bath and of St. John the Divine; Knights
of Malta, and the Committee of 300, among others. Even if the present Pope is
an honorable man, the next one could be another problem-identity because Papism
falls into factions—Christian, Satanic and Luciferian. And everybody
knows : Religion is a problem requiring clarity, facilitation skills and wisdom
coming from Leadership for Peace to obtain.
Immigration. – Her Majesty and the entire Royal family distances
themselves from effects of Treaties she has signed that abrogate and annul
sovereign human rights and economic parity of British citizenry in favor of an
EU invasion of foreign minorities that literally threaten to take over the UK,
namely, the same Quranic imams and scholars that historically by dogma and
doctrine have always sought to conquer Western society.
And again, due to confusion over the
trafficking of “persons” between UN, EU, Quranic, Talmudic limits [against
women, children and dissidents] and [faith and thinking] boundaries--which Her
Majesty left in place and never speaks to--her children are found to be in just
one scandal after another for vicarious profits. Mainstream media endlessly
discuss and gossip about prurient escapades. The fact is, Prince Andrew is
single, he can "date" whoever he wants post-puberty, and "hell
hath no fury like a woman scorned;" so even when no crime has technically
been committed, there is staged uproar in the media.
III
Added
Effort to Confuse: the Political Strategy of Dominance
INTRODUCING DYSINFO AND MISINFO IN THE KINGDOM OF
DAVID-ISRAEL-BRITAIN
Lie Number One is that the United Kingdom has only been in existence since
1603, that it has no basis in religion at all, nor does the Anglican Communion
have coherent history, back to Scotland, back to Irish Kings before the Roman
invasion. This is not true, but the history is hidden.
Lie Number Two is that Roman-Maritime-Laws of the Sea and Laws of the Admiralty including the UCCode are just as legal and reasonable in utility for humane relations In Trust situations as they are for people in relations where there is no Trust at work in relationship. This is false. Common Laws are for people who know each other.
Lie Number Three is that it's reasonable to set the two sets of Law against each other in the Bar Associations, without every having articulated them as discrete sets or pay any attention to the Chaos that is created in relationships by Maritime Law.
Lie Number Four is that citizens of a nation can be treated as cattle who are not privvy to two distinct sets of Law and their contents as to who has dominion or sovereign status.
Lie Number Five is that Law ought to be so voluminous and complicated a nation best not try to teach its stipulations to citizens directly; but rather require a profession of legal experts who profiteer on legal predicaments they can create by virtue of their special knowledge. This is outrageous upon the working people.
Lie Number Six is the "Bar Association" [Inns of Court] definition of a "person" engaging one of the "experts" is "imbecile," even though barristers and lawyers themselves cannot command all sets of legalisms. The costs of Maritime Courts are too burdensome to bear.
Lie Number Seven is that a nation can live by Liberty and Dominion, that sets a profession of Barristers, Lawyers and Legislators against its own peoples.
Lie Number Eight is that a "reigning" Monarch has no responsibility to notice any of this treachery, who presumes no responsibility for serving as check-and-balance to restore the boundaries between Law of the Land [Trust and in occupancy] versus Law of the Sea.
Lie Number Two is that Roman-Maritime-Laws of the Sea and Laws of the Admiralty including the UCCode are just as legal and reasonable in utility for humane relations In Trust situations as they are for people in relations where there is no Trust at work in relationship. This is false. Common Laws are for people who know each other.
Lie Number Three is that it's reasonable to set the two sets of Law against each other in the Bar Associations, without every having articulated them as discrete sets or pay any attention to the Chaos that is created in relationships by Maritime Law.
Lie Number Four is that citizens of a nation can be treated as cattle who are not privvy to two distinct sets of Law and their contents as to who has dominion or sovereign status.
Lie Number Five is that Law ought to be so voluminous and complicated a nation best not try to teach its stipulations to citizens directly; but rather require a profession of legal experts who profiteer on legal predicaments they can create by virtue of their special knowledge. This is outrageous upon the working people.
Lie Number Six is the "Bar Association" [Inns of Court] definition of a "person" engaging one of the "experts" is "imbecile," even though barristers and lawyers themselves cannot command all sets of legalisms. The costs of Maritime Courts are too burdensome to bear.
Lie Number Seven is that a nation can live by Liberty and Dominion, that sets a profession of Barristers, Lawyers and Legislators against its own peoples.
Lie Number Eight is that a "reigning" Monarch has no responsibility to notice any of this treachery, who presumes no responsibility for serving as check-and-balance to restore the boundaries between Law of the Land [Trust and in occupancy] versus Law of the Sea.
IN
FACTS--
Common Law Justice was established
among the bloodlines of Israel Kings by Moses over Mount Horeb after the Exodus
from Egyptian slavery, and the Kingdom's operations guaranteed that the
outcomes of Law would be win/win or pay/win in disputes and conflicts for and
among the peoples themselves; Elitism was not permitted and the King had to
abide by the same Laws as everyone else. Common Law, one version of Laws
of the Land, have always had the purpose of protecting and
restoring balance and justice of citizens and travelers who reside and live and
work on the land in relationship in a nation and culture of people, in
mutuality. (Eg, the Irish Brehon system is another legal system
In Trust.) Common Law is based on truth telling among people who already know
each other.
But what about the Covenant for the
Kingdom in Britain? How did this Royal Family come about it? Did they keep it,
lose it, or throw it away? “Covenant” is not even mentioned in the entire
Buckingham Palace web-site. What is the truth about the Lia Fail, the
Stone of Destiny, the Coronation Stone?
It is here:
Written history going back 2600+
years has been with us all along. In the Jewish Diaspora, the tribal line
of Judah set up residence in Ireland. Britain's Monarchy goes back to Tara
Ireland beginning in 583BC, to settlements where Tribes of Dan and Judah saw
the arrival of the Prophet Jeremiah after Jerusalem's sacking, with King
Zephaniah's two daughters, Teah Tephi and Sophia, among Celts and Gaels.
Holy-Law-abiding culture according to Holy Law and Brehon Law continued until
St. Patrick converted Ireland to Christianity, and the Royal bloodline moved to
Iona Scotland, where and when King Fergus moved the Monarchy and its Lia Fail,
about 500AD. And then, when Edward I conquered Scotland he moved the Lia Fail
from Scotland to London in 1296AD. I mean, if the Crown is Monarchy over the
entire British Isles, then this is its true history--not the current version
which places the beginning of the Monarchy in 1603AD.
[See Hardinge, Leslie, The Celtic
Church in Britain, New York, Teach Services Inc., 2005; Davidy,
Yair, THE TRIBES, the Israelite Origins of Western Peoples, 2009(?),
Hebron, Israel: Russell-Davis Publishers; Hisslop, Bishop Alexander, The
Two Babylons, Proof that Roman Catholic Beliefs Came from Pagan
Babylonian Religion, Ontario, CA: Chick Publications;
Windsor-Cragg, E. Emily, Come Let Us Make Man In Our Image, Charleston,
SC: Amazon.com Publishers, 2014; Windsor-Cragg, Emily E., Restoring the
Kingdom of God to Sovereignty, San Bernardino CA: Amazon.com, Aug 2014.]
Six hundred years after the Kingdom
of David came to Britain, Jesus Christ established the more Subtle
Ethics of the Irish Brehon system of Law--in Judea--when he edited His
Father's Holy Mosaic Law to include personal applications and intentions--much
as the Irish Brehon System of Law was a personal legal 'relationships'
system characterized by mutual trust and reliability. Moreover, with the
Sacrifice of that innocent dissident Yeshua ben Joseph in 33CE, the
point was made that executing the innocent has no reason and no purpose in
creating Good and Just outcomes for people. So Jesus in His Teachings omitted
capital punishment, just as in Irish Brehon Law there was no capital
punishment provision where human relations are in civil conflict. See
Appendix 2, The Beatitudes and Teachings of Yeshua ben Joseph, no
cruelty at all.
Jesus had taught, "Give
therefore what is Caesar's to Caesar; but what is God's to God," THE
OPERATING PRINCIPLE of the Christ--NOT subjection as a vassal-chattel to a
ROMAN-STYLED Corporate STATE by impersonal rules, policies, procedures and
mechanistic practices as in Maritime Law, which is impersonal and in which
there is no mutual expectation of trust.
B-U-T-- How did impersonal Maritime Law (favoring Elites)
overtake Common Laws OF THE LAND in the British Isles?
Here is a Legalist thumbnail history: HOW Maritime Law WON
OVER Common Law in Britain
In the 16th and 17th century a
handful of simultaneous elements changed Law from the customary application of
Common Laws of the Land for the peoples of the Land, to Laws of the Sea, of
Commerce, of corporate statutes. In the 16th century the Spanish Armada
dominated the globe with conquest, and tt the time, Spain was the protector of
Rome and Vatican, Spain and Italy serving as single military-political unit.
One of the Popes in a Papal Bull (I
believe it was “Innocent”) declared the Vatican owned every soul on earth.
Nobody countered that claim (by Annunaki Law). Henry VIII adopted the
Protestant Faith to get free of that statement, and he formed the church of
England to be able to say, "No, they don't own us."
Then with the founding of MI5-intell
by John Dee with collaboration of the Jesus Society of Jesuits, King James
II-VI ordered the British Navy to conquer Spain at sea in battle with the
Spanish Armada and destroy Spain's dominance, which he accomplished. Since that
occurred at sea under Laws of the Sea, High Maritime Laws obtained, and
thereafter, Maritime Laws become dominant over England as well, but Spain lost
all claims and rights that they had won, under Laws of the Sea.
England could now say, "We've
now taken away the ownership of humanity from the Vatican, and we are now
ruling the world because we are in command of the Vatican by monetary dictates
and commerce Law." Queen Victoria continued in the tradition of exercising
sovereign rights of her nation, but forever-after, under a pretext that Common
Laws were still sovereign over the Land, which was no longer the case.
Today like the US, the United
Kingdom is not a common-laws-of-the-land Covenant Nation; it's a “Dinseyworld”
of British Commerce and Statute Codes, and Her Majesty is merely its CEO. She
threw out her Crown when she signed SIX Lisbon Treaties. These facts need
to be known. Queen Elizabeth II is not a reigning Monarch. She is a corporate
mascot of the United Kingdom Corporation. [Personal communication
from historian Brian Zadonne.]
IV
MONARCHY vs. EUROPEAN UNION HEGEMONY
Tyranny of Predatory Leadership arising out of Confusion
between Maritime Statutes and Common Laws
British Monarchs have been silently
presiding with assent to the presence of FOUR stupendous black-hole quagmires,
never speaking to their causes, effects, outcomes or reasons.
FOUR CASES OF MALFEASANCE & OBFUSCATION OF THE MONARCH
PEDOPHILIA AND
"PERSON"-TRAFFICKING--"Just
business-as-usual" in Maritime Law, Quranic & Talmudic Dogma, Doctrine
and Rules--especially in UN-UNESCO Education Policy. See Appendix 3.
Elite control over politics and
legislation is guaranteed by the blackmail of MPs for “procuring”
porn and witnessing or participating in child-abuse and slavery; but in
Maritime Law there are no penalties for subjective harm arising from “procuring
a person as a service,” except cash money, because Maritime Law is based on
indifferent and impersonal social norms, i.e, UN guidelines. And so, scandals
arise and fall, but prosecutions for child-trafficking, snuff porn, slavery
and murder for body parts are few and far between. At the same time,
prosecutions for truly victim-free crimes (like "smoking weed,"
selling raw milk, growing a garden in a "wrong" place or installing
rain-catch barrels) create harmless felons for prison-industries that profit
judges and stockholders of prisons and social services.
"Revenue-enhancement" is now the primary goal of agencies charged
with peace and public safety right under the nose of the Queen, who maintains
her schedule of visits to the poor but never addresses their problems or
terrors. Royal Visits always comprise shallow chit-chat, as a matter of policy.
DEBT AND CLASS BANKRUPTCIES arise out of Bank Usury, fiat-debt financing and bank
fraud, ponzi schemes and collections scams characteristic of the fiat-debt
banking combine whose runaway inflation has impoverished every worker in the
world.
SERIAL WARS FOR PROFITS &
PROPHETS occur because defense
contractors and paid mercenary terrorists are free from Legal Accountability
under Maritime Law and covert paramilitary operations.
RADIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION BY
DEPLETED URANIUM. -- Depleted
uranium trade--THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THIS by a Royal Monarch who
Boo-hoos about ecological balance. Such a level of hypocrisy overlooking
four elephants in the room, belies any claim of leadership skill.
V
CONCLUSIONS
Britain is now a vassal region of a
top-down dictatorial hegemony that operates from Laws of the Sea in Belgium.
It's primarily a banker-dominated cabal in control by covert intel (Mossad-led)
and Masonic blackmail, assassination and psych-ops worldwide. This means,
Common Laws against Harm, Deceit, Fraud, Waste and Abuse are inoperative
because “Business As Usual” takes precedent over Justice, and violence is
profitable.
Therefore, the teachings of Quran
and Talmud with respect to abuse of women and children, sexual slavery, sex and
snuff porn, female genital mutiltion and all the terrors of Islam; plus a caste
system of "Insiders" versus "Outsiders" as promulgated in
the Talmud; plus wholesale slaughter of innocents staged by “terrorist mercenaries”
is permitted by Radicals under the "Equality of Religion" statute of
the UN and EU Charters, all of which ARE "LEGAL" TO THE EXTENT
THESE PRACTICES CANNOT AND WILL NOT BE PROSECUTED by Courts of the Land.
Indeed, terrorism is staged to keep all people intimidated and in subjection.
Fie on this!
Never mind, corporate hegemony is
killing the planet with chemicals, contracted diseases and contaminated
vaccines, and blaming the working people all the while.
Totalitarianism and terrorism have
come to Britain, and there is no reason for these to ever cease, because
blackmail, assassinations and trafficking against dissenters can keep a
Legalized Crime Syndicate in place for generations until and unless populations
are energized or Elites get lazy and let go of their power by leaving the world
stage.
This Queen Elizabeth II and her
branch of the Line of David let it happen, and they have been in silent
collusion the whole time, whereas my father said no, not this. Not more war,
because he had spent four years on the ground in World War I. No, not more
financial manipulations; he was pro-labor. And I'm here to say to you, Elites
are just letting it happen unless this Throne is turned over to a bloodline
legal heir who serves the people, to correct these matters, with an education,
training, God's Grace and Strong Arm [whatever that means] of Almighty
Sovereign YHVH, who with the Patriarch Jacob, forged this Covenant so long ago.
Vastly rich people didn't just let
this happen; they also presided over the gagging of the media; the concealment
of damage their own corporations cause by marketing and distributing
contaminated medical pharmaceuticals, depleted uranium products, insecticides
and genetically modified sterile seeds; and oil rig accidents uncorrected that BP
Oil Co weaseled out of repairing). Today Elites are planet-killers, loose
cannons ecologically, who call on the rest of us in this world to tighten our
belts and take the blame. But what's happening to us, the
English-speaking peoples of the world, hides behind a curtain of secrecy, here:
[ http://www.holyconservancy.org/protocol.pdf ] get your
complete “Protocols of the Elders of Zion," Illuminist Playbook for
Globalist New World Order hegemony, 46 pages, two-up, print landscape
orientation. And Her Majesty either doesn't know anything about it or she's in
on it!
I figure, we only have weeks or
months at best to stop the bankster-war parties and their psychopathic
hierarchy from starting another world war to comply with Albert Pike's
confabulated prophecies of THREE WORLD WARS. Leaders who consent to this
degradation of civil society must be taken aside and given a broom and a hovel,
in exchange for their heinous acts. [ WORLD WAR 3. THE FINAL SOCIAL
CATACLYSM.
Non-linear warfare is waged
against us all by confusing what we can know. This is a deplorable way to keep
Peoples away from knowing anything true or not true.
Journalists in the West are
forbidden to tell what are true outcomes and not true (hoaxed events).
But Elites either don't care or they are sanctioning this perfidious
behavior. [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp-Wh77wt1o ]
I believe Her Majesty ought to be
explaining to us, >why< she has not called attention to the Illuminati
plans to control, dominate and >clear< this planet of its peoples.
VI
LAWS OF MARRIAGE & BLOODLINE
[I made a copy of the Mosaic Law,
which every King's offspring in the Kingdom of David is required to make,
and it is here: http://www.holyconservancy.org/2728.htm.]
English Bill of Rights, 1689, An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject
and Settling the Succession of the Crown. Re-established the monarchy as a
result of the Glorious Revolution. Avalon Project.
Act of Settlement, June 12, 1701, Great Britain Act of Parliament that, since 1701, has
regulated the succession to the throne of Great Britain.
His Majesty's Declaration of
Abdication Act, 1936, recognised and ratified the
abdication of King Edward VIII and passed succession to his brother Prince
Albert, Duke of York (who subsequently became King George VI). The act also
excluded any possible future descendants of Edward from the line of succession.
On one hand, Royals claim to follow
the Christian practices of Marriage and legitimate family, but on the other
hand, Christian Ethics are now substantially missing from UK State policies
and party politics. SEE below.
VIII
TAVISTOCK
INSTITUTE
|
QUOTE: The ideology of
American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human
Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the
11th Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock
on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish
the "breaking point" of men under stress, under the direction of
the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese.
Tavistock Institute is
headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield
Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess
Bonaparte. Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines
of "controlling" humans established it as the world center of
foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to
the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson
Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies
at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force
Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the
corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock
controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin
Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is
conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.
|
Tavistock Institute developed the
mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American
prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been
widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless
outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through
topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock
in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a "refugee", the first of
many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated
the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve
us in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with
Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed
to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies. To implement this
agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before
setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS program,
as well as the CIA always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock
Institute.
Tavistock Institute originated the
mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill purely as a
clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they
watched the "guinea pigs" reacting under "controlled laboratory
conditions". All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a
single goal---to break down the psychological strength of the individual and
render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique
which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of
religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by the Tavistock
scientists as weapons of crowd control. The methods of Freudian psychotherapy
induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by
destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to "establish
new rituals of personal interaction", that is, to indulge in brief sexual
encounters which actually set the participants adrift with no stable personal
relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain
a family. UNQUOTE
The very idea that Her Majesty
hasn't been aware of the deleterious effects of Tavistock propaganda upon the
moral and ethical foundation of Britain is simply beyond cognition. She
can't be that stupefied; neither can she be that blind to the reality that
Tavistock's mandate is to undo “Christian” Ethics en toto; but here Elizabeth
II is, Head of the Church of England!
VII
UNESCO'S
COMMON CORE SEX CURRICULA
“Never
mind, morality.”
QUOTE TEACHINGS: The Common Core curriculum encourages parents to be
supportive and open-minded to gender identity and sexual orientation, and
discourages them from enforcing traditional gender identities: “Confusion about
these issues and fear of homosexuality (homophobia) has caused many parents and
other adults to limit how girls and boys express themselves.”
One curriculum asks parents to
refrain from teaching children about morality, as there are no right and wrong
values, while another model curriculum asks parents to address contradictions
in “religious approaches and rights based approaches.”
Perhaps the most disturbing of the
curricula asks parents to foster early sexual development by encouraging
children to “experience genital pleasure” from birth until age 2 and by age 3,
to encourage “sex play.” The report also heavily promotes the encouragement
of abortion and lists the International Planned Parenthood Federation and other
abortion advocacy organizations as references.
Her Majesty's VOW, remember ? "Will
you, to the utmost of your power, maintain the Laws of God and the true
profession of the gospel?" Or did we all forget that the limits
and boundaries on sexual behavior have the outcome of protecting bloodline
families, because Christianity is “about” maintaining bloodline families
from generation-to-generation and from millennium-to-millennium . . . ?
And so, in the effort to protect family vows and covenants, we do abridge and
edit our sexual behavior voluntarily. But has Her Majesty demanded that
Britain's Christians be allowed to opt out from the teachings of profligate
sexual behavior in the face of Common Core Curricula contradictions? Not
a word.
Moreover, Common Core teachings
justify pedophilia (and resultant blackmail) coerce certain adults who buy in
to fail and fall in their reputations. Indeed! It is very easy to
blackmail an Elite who has opted in to profligate sexual practices. This
is how totalitarianism gets its foothold, its control over individuals.
VIII
PARTIES
OF THE FIRST PART
Picture
is of Father and Grandson Edward at age 22
The Complainant is daughter of King Edward VIII who became
the Duke of Windsor when he fled and then was exiled from his home country--who
ruled for only ten months among his enemies. Her books at Amazon cover
Earth's ET history, History of Hierarchy and Law http://www.amazon.com/dp/1492359750,
Restoring the Kingdom of God to Sovereignty, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451529155/
, and other volumes of Community Development, Conspiracies and Crafts, 17 in
all.
Emily Elizabeth Windsor-Cragg, born
in 1944 in Edward's 50th year, is educated and trained in Group
Problem Solving, Conflict and Dispute Analysis and IT. See her Profile at
LinkedIN.com.
Five grown children, Heather Anne,
Andrew, Dayna Jeanette, Edward Scott and Steven Walter (four with university
degrees) command skills in IT, Hospitality, Permaculture, Military Security and
Logistics. No one in our family has ever been charged with a crime. To date,
only one was divorced and remarried. Nine grandchildren are all healthy
and somewhat gifted.
What's
going on with the Windsor family RE: SUCCESSION
Edward violated the 1772 Marriage
Act by marrying a divorcee who was [secretly] a double Mi-5 agent in the employ
of King George V during WWI serving as intermediary between the King and his
German cousin Kaiser Wilhelm, as well as with the eldest son, Adolph.
As a result Parliament [knowing the
secret] passed an Act that removed Edward's Royal privileges and all of any
issue/children he may have ever had. There's reason to believe from "a
King's Story," that if Edward ever found out who and what Wallis was, it
never seemed to show up in his writings, and his efforts to regain the throne
were pitiful and few and consisted of some negotiations with Germans, who were
in charge anyway.
Now. Charles has violated the exact
same act, and his present wife has Catholic connections, also forbidden by Law.
So, it appears to me that the Royals can do one of two things: by lawful
precedent, cut Charles and his kids off (William, Harry and George) as happened
before to Edward;
OR, by rescinding the special Act
against Edward, place Charles back in the line of succession except for one
matter: rescinding that Act would restore me and my bloodline as members
(albeit illegitimate] of the family, the bloodline of which I live in God's
sight by blood.
OR, "FORMAL REQUEST: I
request Parliament to revoke the Abdication Act and so amend the Act of
Settlement (1700) as to restore me and my bloodline as members and, after due
deliberation, to elevate me to the UK Throne as Monarch with the intention to
resolve and thrive--not further confound and penalize--the United Kingdom as a
nation and group of compatible cultures."
PROOF
OF FAMILY LINE OF DESCENT.
Not having access to samples of my
parents' blood, I have not yet undergone the sort of DNA test that establish
parenthood. But of course, I will do so when enabled to do so.
PORPHYRIA, disease of the Bloodline. People ask me how I know I'm
Edward Duke of Windsor's daughter. I have the congenital blood condition called
Porphyria, the symptoms of which are noted in suffered by Elizabeth the First's
reign; which sidelined King George the Third; also notable carriers both George
V and his wife, May Teck, both of whom were direct descendants of Geo III, were
my grandparents on my father's side. I have it, my son Andrew and his daughter
Jessica have a variant of it. No way that disease arises out of the blue; it's
by genetics alone. I'm in the bloodline, sidelined, scapegoated and
disinherited through no fault of my own. And She, Her Majesty, has lost her
moorings ... insofar as Justice with Mercy, to the Covenant with God. ... No I
do not sacrifice babies ... to keep going. No need to harm anyone.
X
LOOKING
TO A FUTURE
When I found out Edward Duke of
Windsor was my father and sire (I was in my fifties), I called out to God in
prayer, "Why on earth did you let this go until I'm an old woman?!"
And He said to me, "I waited
until I could see that corruption was irreversible."
And so I asked, "So what do
you want me to do about it?"
And He said, "You're going
to have run with the ball, because your father and his relatives dropped the
ball."
And I replied, "What?! I'm
not prepared to do anything like that."
And He said, "You don't have
to do anything but listen to My Words and take them down, daily."
And so I started writing down what I
hear Him "think" to me. I never heard audible words, just meanings in
silence. I have written TWELVE books of dictation since I "retired"
in 2001: Lia Fail Covenant, Orientation to Hierarchy, Use of Space,
Nutrition, Royal Style, Speeches & Topics, plus the six books I
published: Let your No Mean No, Come Take Life's Water Free, Civil
Life in Galactic History, Come Let Us Make Man in our Image, Restoration of the
Kingdom of God, and Path to Orion yes we Can.
Before that, my Masters thesis
consisted of, "Effect of television on children," "Conflict
Analysis and resolution," and "Large Group Problem Facilitation &
Resolution," Interactive Management system to debrief a large crowd of
their true experiences in hierarchy.
My Source has kept me busy at work,
and of course, people back away from me for speaking of “God” in any context
including the instant Church.
I discovered My father Edward's problem
was that he was never educated, mentored, apprenticed or guided into the role
of King. He was left to founder because his father King George V sensed the
young Prince wasn't going to go along with the Round Table Agenda, the Order of
the Garter, Tavistock and Rothschild version of a worldwide politicaleconomic
order controlled top-down by rich men.
Jesus didn't hang out with rich men,
He was level-ler. Edward was pro-Labor, a level-ler of the playing field. He
father was not in any case going to allow Edward to reach the Throne intact, so
he waited until Edward stumbled, and the King caught him in the marriage net
which the King had forbidden for twenty-odd years.
And so we have the Official Version
of Wallis Simpson case which, like the JFK story, the OKC95 story, the Ruby
Ridge story, the Titanic story, and the WTC 9/11 story, read like a fairy tale
of helplessness, powerlessness and ignorance ... because that's what those
stories have been . . . hoaxed . . . but in the atomic age.
What humans are faced with today is
nothing less than annihilation of mankind for the benefit of Luciferian-ETs
[Masonic Orders] who want to clear the planet for galactic commerce; bankers,
defense contractors, airlines, logistics companies, social services, courts and
other impersonal hierarchies that have taken human relationships down into the
gutter, into filth, into Oblivion of asymmetrical war against people who never
did any harm to anybody.
So, it doesn't matter what I might
want to do, unless it matters to the rest of toxic, psychopathic leadership
that this world and our people should not be annihilated into extinction,
enslaved into galactic tyranny, starved into submission, destroyed by contrived
diseases and chemical pollutants--not to mention, bloodlines and oceans
depopulated by depleted uranium toxicity which is permanent, from buried
weapons of war, from aging atomic reactors, with sterile seeds and RoundUP by
Monsanto killing beneficial insects and small birds and poisoning the entire
living food chain.
SO, IF THE REST OF –THIS-- my
generation, those who were born during WWII, don't care --or speak up-- what
happens to the world, to their children and grandchildren, then God says, He
can just take it all down --again-- as He did in Noah's day due to genetic malformed
hybrids out of scale with the ecosystem. But this time, He doesn't have to put
it back up again . . . What for? . . . And start the same sort of human ethical
shambles once more? There's no reason to permit chaos, cruelty, slavery and
misery at this scale.
YHVH runs this solar cluster, tends
the sun and the orbits, makes sure this planet stays safe. And there are other
sectors of space that can abide with this beautiful planet in Peace with
Justice; and if the people here don't care to unseat psychopathic leaders,
well, They the Cosmic Sylph Community can just move us elsewhere, and
Leadership can count their days in hours and minutes.
That's what "God YHVH"
said to me, so I got really busy and took it all down ... for y'all to read,
consider and take to heart. After all, the Covenant with Abraham is where this
Royal House began; and if the people want to take it down into Hell, well,
that's not God's fault.
He--YHVH--doesn't have to do all
this work to provide souls' environment, again for deceit and ruin to be
practically the only outcome. --Emily Windsor-Cragg
No comments:
Post a Comment